Abstract
Quality is one of the important keys in the pharmaceutical industry in order to face and win the competition. Instability in the water treatment process causes the water quality does not comply with quality standards. This study aimed to evaluate the water treatment process in the pharmaceutical industry, to investigate the cause of the case out of specification (OOS) and propose improvements through application of six sigma method. The object of this research done on some parameters of water generated in the water treatment process, such as pH, conductivity and total plate count. Stages of procedures performed in this study included analysis of data normality, control chart analysis and determine the process capability. Minitab software also used to assist in the calculation and analysis. The results showed the improvement process provide a significant change with the increase in the average an index of Capability Process around 1.07 and decrease the possibility of producing a defective system of about 712 ppm. Furthermore, the study also indicates an increase in the sigma level from 2.30 into 4.69.
Keywords: Quality, WTP, Six Sigma, DMAIC, Pharmaceutical industry
link:
https://www.ripublication.com/ijaer17/ijaerv12n6_07.pdf
Wednesday, October 25, 2017
Tuesday, October 3, 2017
Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan dengan Metode AHP dan Rating Scale
Abstract
PT. X organizes the office promotion every year, however it has not implemented the performance appraisal concept. This study was conducted on junior analyst at Laboratory Department of Routine Test in PT.X which has the highest number of employees in PT. X. This research aimed to find out the performance appraisal criteria and sub criteria of the junior analysts, provide the weighting for each criteria and sub criteria using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, and recommend the planning framework of performance appraisal for junior analyst using Rating-Scale method in order to conduct the office promotion. The main criteria derived from this research were attendance, working target attainment, work thoroughness, proactive, empathy, cooperation (team/organization), analytical thinking, and flexibility. The result showed the working target attainment as the most important of the criterion approximately 0.248. Moreover, the consistency ratio around 0.020. In addition, the result of this research is applicable and could be proposed for conducting performance appraisal of junior analysts at Laboratory Department of PT.X in order to perform the office promotion.
link:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)